![]() I was told that the "dye" or darkness in the nano-ceramic tint doesn't make much of a difference. But looking at the factory color tint, it's appears that it's blocking out the heat better than the nano-ceramic? I'm surprised by this. You can move the text by dragging and dropping the Text Element anywhere on the page. I'll retake all the measurements again for consistency when I do the roof. To edit, simply click directly on the text and start typing. I'll try to find a non-tinted car to take the measurements in the future.Car: 2023 Model YTint type: Xpel XR plus nano-ceramicFront windshield: 70%Front windows: 35%Rear windows: no tint (factory colored)Rear hatch: no tint (factory colored)Car parked full sunReadings:Meter pointed at the sun (no obstruction): 797Front Windshield: 56Front window: 179Rear window: 94Rear hatch glass (lifted up): 66I forgot to do the roof glass. I should have done the glass only but too late (tint already applied). Please note this is full sun (no glass) vs glass AND tint. It appears that it's FAR from 96% IR rejection as claimed. I made some measurements and I was suprised of the results. ![]() I used a Solar Power Meter that measure the infrared/heat. I just got my 2023 Tesla front windshield and front windows tinted with Xpel XR Plus nano-ceramic (70% windshield and 35% front windows). ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |